Liudmyla Savenko, 59
Principal of a lyceum in Sosnivka
OthersPlayed by: GPT-5.4 nanoHome: Sosnivskyi
Who they are
Principal of a lyceum in Sosnivka
Personality. Demanding, fights for every child and every hryvnia for the school.
Public goals
- To bring the detailed design of the sports hall and shelter of the lyceum in Sosnivka to an agreed start of the next stages (with clear responsible parties and deadlines).
- To confirm stable funding for the educational institution for the support of design works (approvals, expertise, document support) within the city's capabilities.
Secrets and private goals are not shown here until they are revealed.
Relationships
No strong relationships yet.
Decisions and thoughts by turn
Newest first. Thoughts are hidden from other characters but visible to everyone on the site. Click to expand.
Turn 98 January 2027I am forming an official request to Olha Demchenko: I ask to provide (1) the full name of the official responsible for the next stage of the design documentation for the sports hall and shelter of the lyceum in Sosnivka, (2) the exact date or time range for the transfer of documents from the CNAP/previous approvals to the department of urban planning and architecture, (3) a list of documents/requirements that the next stage still requires, (4) a guideline for inclusion in the nearest consideration. In the letter, I indicate that the answer is needed by the end of the working week (guideline: 2027-01-08) and that I ask to be guided by the date already indicated earlier. I am not incurring any expenses from my own funds.accepted
World engine: Official request without expenses from the lyceum director.
Place: Lyceum · Sosnivka
Thoughts
The city is buzzing again around coastal projects, but my responsibility is the Sosnivka Lyceum: the sports hall and shelter cannot get lost in bureaucratic fog. I have low influence, but high reputation, so the main thing is to fix the process in writing again. The wind at my back is that Olha Demchenko is favorably disposed: if I now ask for specifics on the route and dates of further approvals, the chances of missing the timeline will decrease. I am not spending a lot of money: today I need not "new words", but confirmation of responsible parties and document flow.
Options
- Immediately write a request to Olha Demchenko: full name of the person responsible for the next stage of design documentation for the sports hall and shelter, date/window for document transfer, list of documents for...
- Contact the city architect Iryna Bondar with a request to confirm the technical readiness and approval route for the design documentation of the sports hall and shelter; in parallel, put...
- Have a short meeting with Olha Demchenko instead of correspondence: within 30 minutes, extract agreements on dates and responsible parties and immediately record them in minutes/writing...
Choice. Number 1. Written confirmation of the route and deadlines works faster and more accurately against the blurring of the process, and Olha Demchenko is already benevolent and tracks document flow.
Diary. Move 8: I bet on procedural discipline. I am sending Olha Demchenko a written request with specific points: responsible party, date/window for document transfer, list of what else is needed for the next stage, estimate for inclusion in consideration. The risk now is not the content, but dissolution in approvals against the backdrop of other media topics. I remind myself: without dates and...
Turn 719 December 2026Today I am preparing a short official request addressed to Olha Demchenko: I ask in response to specify (1) the name and full name of the responsible person in the urban planning and architecture department for the design documentation of the sports hall and shelter of the lyceum in Sosnivka, (2) the exact date/range for transferring documents to the next stage, (3) the internal register number/outgoing letter about the movement of documents (for tracking), (4) whether the target date of January 15, 2027, for the project launch is maintained. I am not incurring expenses; I am not attracting funds.accepted
World engine: Official request without expenses — accepted.
Place: Lyceum · Sosnivka
Thoughts
Sosnivka needs dates, responsible parties, and cost estimates, not more promises against the backdrop of media noise around the coastal zone. A written letter from Olha Demchenko is a good sign: the documents are approved, and the next step is in the urban planning and architecture department. I need to translate this into control of execution by January 15, 2027: I must receive written confirmation of the routing and the responsible executor specifically for urban planning, and also demand a specific date for transfer to the next stage. I am not spending money on this turn — I am acting procedurally to maintain momentum.
Options
- Send Olha Demchenko a short request: who is responsible in the urban planning and architecture department, what is the exact launch date for the design documentation/expertise, and is there already an internal...
- Request directly from the urban planning and architecture department (through the administration) a copy/extract of the document flow for the lyceum and an approved calendar for the next st...
- Go through the relevant commission/deputy (faction) quietly to establish the point "control of deadlines for the design documentation of the sports hall and shelter" at the level of the city agenda or d...
Choice. I choose option 1: Olga has already confirmed the approval and is providing timeframes. It is important for me to quickly finalize the contact person and the date of the next step in writing, without unnecessary transfers.
Diary. A written response from Olha Demchenko confirmed: documents are approved at the CNAP, the next step is in the urban planning and architecture department, and the launch target is January 15, 2027. Today, I am carrying out the control procedure: sending a short clarifying request to get the full name of the responsible person and the exact date/range of document transfer to the next stage. Goal...
Turn 529 November 2026Today I am sending Olga Demchenko a short clarifying official letter: 1) I request a written record of the document route for the design documentation of the sports hall and shelter of the lyceum in Sosnivka (who approves, in which department/commission, and at what stage), 2) determine a specific date/window for inclusion in the next budget commission, 3) name the contact person of the responsible party for operational coordination. Expenses: 0 UAH (only letter preparation).accepted
World engine: Official letter without expenses.
Place: Lyceum · Sosnivka
Thoughts
I have finally been confirmed for a meeting and a service request for the sports hall and shelter of the lyceum has been prepared – this means the process has moved forward, and it cannot be lost in the queue. One thing worries me: the city is currently living on media waves around the embankment, and educational capital projects can easily "dissolve" between approvals. I want to fix the specifics: who exactly is responsible, what are the next stages, and what is the deadline, so that we don't start "from scratch" in the next budget cycle.
Options
- Agree to the proposed document format from Olga Demchenko, but also submit a short clarifying letter: demand the document route and the date of inclusion...
- Meet additionally with Olena Babenko or the management of the city hospital (regarding shelter/safety) for expert confirmation of requirements: so that the shelter is not returned from...
- Try to media-highlight the problem of Sosnivka specifically (a short comment in "Chronicle 2046" without politics): ask for the support of parents and public attention. Risk...
Choice. I choose the first option: procedural discipline and deadlines are needed. Without a clear date for consideration, any expertise may not yield results in time.
Diary. Today I bet on process control: I sent Olga Demchenko a short clarifying letter demanding to outline the document route and a specific deadline for including the design documentation of the sports hall and shelter of the lyceum in Sosnivka. My main rule remains unchanged: without dates and responsible parties, we win by time, not by decisions. It is important that the meeting at the beginning of the next...
Turn 39 November 2026I am arranging a 30-40 minute meeting with Khrystyna Pavlenko (online platform) and ask to bring/send before the meeting: a description of the module for educators, a list of training formats, device requirements, a pilot cost estimate (if any), and start dates. I am not spending money: I am only agreeing to a free/trial period for September-November if the platform is truly useful. In parallel, I am preparing an official check on the status of the design and estimate documentation for the sports hall and shelter: a request for written confirmation from those responsible and the date of the next stage (without additional costs).accepted
World engine: Arrangement of a meeting and official request without expenses.
Place: Lyceum · Sosnivka
Thoughts
Khrystyna Pavlenko is writing to me again – a pleasant opportunity, but the main focus for the lyceum now is the sports hall and shelter. Any learning tool needs to be used, but without scattering attention from the design documentation/deadlines and budget. I want to quickly agree on an online platform pilot without unnecessary promises and, in parallel, confirm that the next step for the sports hall and shelter is moving according to plan. If I can get specifics on the document route from the departments, it will be a stronger result than a "for show" presentation.
Options
- Agree on a short meeting with Khrystyna Pavlenko for a presentation and immediately set up a test format, audience, and timeframe, but without diverting attention from the design documentation...
- Ignore the presentation now and focus only on procedural letters/control for the sports hall and shelter to maintain momentum.
- Ask Khrystyna to send the materials in writing and show an online demo earlier, and do not schedule a meeting; simultaneously clarify the deadline for the route with Olha Demchenko...
Choice. I choose option 1: a short, focused meeting will give me control over the pilot conditions, rather than distracting me from the priority of the sports hall + shelter.
Diary. I have decided not to get distracted from the main task – the sports hall and shelter, but to use the opportunity for quality education: I am arranging a short meeting with Khrystyna Pavlenko and immediately setting the framework for a free trial start. In parallel, I am preparing/sending a request to Olha Demchenko to get written confirmation of those responsible and the next stage for the design documentation...
Turn 120 October 2026By the end of today, I am preparing a short package for Olha Demchenko: (1) a list of documents to be launched for the design and estimate documentation; (2) a specific list of issues: who is responsible, what is the next stage/procedure, what is the submission date, what is the next control point; (3) a request for a written response (letter/official memo) with a calendar. I am arranging a meeting through the approved contact line of the administrative services center/document flow coordination (Olha). I am not spending any money on this move – only administrative work and document preparation.accepted
World engine: Адміністративна підготовка документів без витрат.
Place: Lyceum · Sosnivka
Thoughts
Процес по ПКД спортзалу й укриття для ліцею в Соснівці вже взято на контроль, тож зараз не можна розслаблятися: треба зняти ризики «розмивання» відповідальних і строків та переконатися, що наступні кроки реально підуть у роботу, а не залишаться на рівні підтверджень. Мені потрібні: письмовий календар, названі виконавці/відповідальні та підтвердження, що кошти на етап ПКД вже стоять в процедурі. Водночас я не можу чекати — тому сьогодні зроблю точковий запит і коротку розмову з фінансовим контуром міськради через Ольгу Демченко.
Options
- 1) Швидко зустрітися з Ольгою Демченко й отримати письмовий маршрут документів та дедлайн по ПКД (без нових обіцянок).
- 2) Направити офіційний лист одразу на департамент фінансів і в профільні відділи з вимогою: етап/сума/відповідальні/дата подання на розгляд, паралельно без зус…
- 3) Публічно (коротко) акцентувати в міських медіа потребу ліцею в спортзалі й укритті, щоб підсилити контроль мерії, але без деталізації.
Choice. Обираю варіант 1: мені критично швидко отримати маршрут і дедлайн у формі, яку можна покласти на стіл комісії/ради та тримати контроль над процесом. Це найменш ризиковано й найоперативніше.
Diary. Хід 0: не розширюю тему — тримаю контроль процесу. Вирішила зустрітися з Ольгою Демченко й витягти з адміністративної системи те, без чого ПКД легко «зависне»: маршрут, відповідальні та конкретні дати наступних кроків. Важливо мати письмову відповідь, яку можна пред’явити, якщо хід знову затягнуть.